Logo puttering

So this morning I ran into this site full of comics critique and thinking. One bit that stuck with me in random reading is the idea that a good logo reads at 100 pixels wide – that’s the size your book’s gonna be in a thumbnail on a web store.

I like the current logo I have but it does not pass that test. So I booted up Illustrator and started playing around with different fonts.

Logos! Click for full-size.

Ultimately I came back to a variant of the original logo – it’s the same font; I really think the “sixties Saul Bass movie poster” kind of font tells you something about the kind of visuals you’ll find within. The high-tech tilted font was obviously a contender, but it was just too damn fiddly and really didn’t read well at small sizes. But that one lead me to the conflicting arrows motif, which I think really works with the story on multiple levels – it creates a sensation of horizontal motion, which both hints at the high-speed acrobatics of Rita-1 and prepares you for the weird narrative games I’m playing. And setting “Rita” into the arrow pointing the other way suggests complexity.

With a revised logo at hand, I of course had to see how it would work in context! So I knocked out a couple of cover thumbnails. With the first two, I tried putting it on the top, where a traditional comic would put it for maximum visibility on the rack. But it really felt wrong there, so I moved it to the middle, and tried a variant on the “chord” panel from the middle of chapter 4, then just went for head-and-shoulders crops of the various Ritae doing characteristic things.

I’ll probably play with it some more, and I suspect I’ll keep the original variant for the title page – but I think this dual-arrow version is much more powerful than just the text floating around with a couple arrows going through it.

2 thoughts on “Logo puttering

  1. Heya, enjoying the comic and liking both the old and new logos.

    Thought I’d chime in though that viewing the logos in the previews on my iPhone, no 6 is the only really distinct/legible one. But that’s likely more to do with the colour contrasts.

    Then again, I doubt that effectiveness at 3mm wide is really that relevant.

    • *pulls out her phone and looks* Oh yeah you’re right. Huh. I’m probably gonna stick with the dual arrows though, as I have absolutely no plans to optimize this thing for phone reading. (And my hat is off to you if you’re actually able to make sense of it one panel at a time!) Thanks for making me explicitly ponder that though! n.n

Leave a Reply to AlecatCancel reply